Here in the capital of France, so many people here find it hard to believe that the version of President John F. Kennedy’s assassination set in stone by the Warren Commission – the one concluding that assassin Lee Harvey Oswald was acted alone when he fired a bullet with questionable trajectory into a sitting US president from the sixth-floor window of the Texas School Book Depository 58 years ago. All you really need to know about French skepticism of official government speeches is that this is the country whose citizens still vividly remember the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in Ukraine in 1986 and the French government’s minimization of the radioactive cloud that then floated across France, despite panic in neighboring Germany at the time.
Now, some new revelations from JFK may spread the idea that we can trust the US government as much as that of France. “The Cuban exile told his sons that he had trained Oswald, the accused JFK assassin, in a secret CIA camp,” a Miami Herald read. big title published October 30. The story goes that Ricardo Morales, a sniper instructor working for the CIA to train Cuban exiles in a bid to overthrow Cuban leader Fidel Castro in the early 1960s, had trained Lee Harvey Oswald in training supported by the CIA.
But what would Lee Harvey Oswald have done among the members of what appears to be Brigade 2506 or Alpha 66 or some other splinter group linked to the CIA? These recruits were mostly Cuban expatriates recruited by the CIA in Miami and secretly trained in Guatemala, Florida, Louisiana and Alabama with the aim of invading Cuba and toppling Castro in the failed invasion of the Bay of Pigs.
It is hard to imagine why Oswald could have found himself drawn to the political and ideological crusade of anti-Castro obsessives who, at the time of Kennedy’s death, were upset that Castro had yet to meet the same fate, to especially since Oswald’s loyalties seemed to be the opposite. Various sources report that Oswald had “actively advocated” for Castro. It would therefore make sense for Oswald to hang out with Cuban dissidents to spy on them on behalf of the Castro government – something former CIA officer Bob Baer also argued in a Historical channel series, “Declassified JFK: Tracking Oswald”. Barr’s research connects Oswald with the Cuban splinter group Alpha 66 and with Cuban intelligence officials, most notably during a trip to Mexico City.
If all of this is true, then Oswald had contacts with the American and Cuban secret services and would have had the opportunity to act as a double agent. It is no exaggeration to imagine how someone like him could be easily manipulated by intelligence professionals to at least show up somewhere on command when warranted. Which could explain the reply when a journalist asked him following the assassination: âDid you shoot the president? To which he replied: “No. I’m just a scapegoat.
The lens of Oswald’s active involvement in the Cuban dissident movement makes it easy to portray the CIA as the master manipulator with a role in JFK’s death. And his pro-Castro activism and CIA-noted contacts with Cuban secret services provide a practical link between JFK’s death and the Castro government.
If anyone wanted to deliberately cover their tracks, Oswald would indeed have been the perfect useful idiot to serve as a cover. And this new information about Oswald’s background and contacts underscores why so many years later, people still don’t feel like they have the whole story.
In 1992, Congress moved to declassify all documents related to the assassination by October 26, 2017, in response to public outrage over Oliver Stone’s Hollywood film, “JFK,” discrediting the official government narrative. Former President Donald Trump delayed declassification, citing “issues of national security, law enforcement and foreign affairs” and “potentially irreversible damage to the security of our nation.”
Likewise, President Joe Biden also raised national security concerns in refusing to release the documents. “Continued temporary postponement is necessary to protect against identifiable damage to military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that are of such gravity as to outweighs the public interest of immediate disclosure, âthe White House read. note.
These two White House claims arguably point to CIA shenanigans. Otherwise, why would the US government continue to want to protect Fidel Castro if Oswald served as a Cuban trump card? Likewise, if Oswald acted alone, as long-held government theory claims, then why continue to protect a dead man?
If declassification of JFK’s assassination records could harm US national security, as the state keeps claiming, then what other questionable official narratives are also being protected at this time under the pretext of “security?” national âwhile leading citizens to believe lies or parts of truths?
Rachel Marsden is a columnist and political strategist.